10 research outputs found
Gas chromatography vs. quantum cascade laser-based N<sub>2</sub>O flux measurements using a novel chamber design
Recent advances in laser spectrometry offer new opportunities to
investigate the soilâatmosphere exchange of nitrous oxide. During two field
campaigns conducted at a grassland site and a willow field, we tested the
performance of a quantum cascade laser (QCL) connected to a newly developed
automated chamber system against a conventional gas chromatography (GC)
approach using the same chambers plus an automated gas sampling unit with
septum capped vials and subsequent laboratory GC analysis. Through its high
precision and time resolution, data of the QCL system were used for
quantifying the commonly observed nonlinearity in concentration changes
during chamber deployment, making the calculation of exchange fluxes more
accurate by the application of exponential models. As expected, the curvature
values in the concentration increase was higher during long (60âŻmin) chamber
closure times and under high-flux conditions
(FN2OâŻ>âŻ150âŻÂ”g NâŻmâ2âŻhâ1)
than those values that were found when chambers were closed for only 10âŻmin and/or
when fluxes were in a typical range of 2 to
50âŻÂ”g NâŻmâ2âŻhâ1. Extremely low standard errors of
fluxes, i.e., from ââŒââŻ0.2 to 1.7âŻ% of the flux value, were observed
regardless of linear or exponential flux calculation when using QCL data.
Thus, we recommend reducing chamber closure times to a maximum of 10âŻmin
when a fast-response analyzer is available and this type of chamber system is
used to keep soil disturbance low and conditions around the chamber plot as
natural as possible. Further, applying linear regression to a 3âŻmin data
window with rejecting the first 2âŻmin after closure and a sampling time
of every 5âŻs proved to be sufficient for robust flux determination while ensuring
that standard errors of N2O fluxes were still on a relatively low level.
Despite low signal-to-noise ratios, GC was still found to be a useful method
to determine the mean the soilâatmosphere exchange of N2O on longer timescales
during specific campaigns. Intriguingly, the consistency between GC and
QCL-based campaign averages was better under low than under high N2O
efflux conditions, although single flux values were highly scattered during
the low efflux campaign. Furthermore, the QCL technology provides a useful
tool to accurately investigate the highly debated topic of diurnal courses
of N2O fluxes and its controlling factors. Our new chamber design
protects the measurement spot from unintended shading and minimizes
disturbance of throughfall, thereby complying with high quality requirements
of long-term observation studies and research infrastructures
ORCHIDEE-PEAT (revision 4596), a model for northern peatland CO2, water, and energy fluxes on daily to annual scales
Peatlands store substantial amounts of carbon and are vulnerable to climate change. We present a modified version of the Organising Carbon and Hydrology In Dynamic Ecosystems (ORCHIDEE) land surface model for simulating the hydrology, surface energy, and CO2 fluxes of peatlands on daily to annual timescales. The model includes a separate soil tile in each 0.5 degrees grid cell, defined from a global peatland map and identified with peat-specific soil hydraulic properties. Runoff from non-peat vegetation within a grid cell containing a fraction of peat is routed to this peat soil tile, which maintains shallow water tables. The water table position separates oxic from anoxic decomposition. The model was evaluated against eddy-covariance (EC) observations from 30 northern peatland sites, with the maximum rate of carboxylation (V-cmax) being optimized at each site. Regarding short-term day-to-day variations, the model performance was good for gross primary production (GPP) (r(2) = 0.76; Nash-Sutcliffe modeling efficiency, MEF = 0.76) and ecosystem respiration (ER, r(2) = 0.78, MEF = 0.75), with lesser accuracy for latent heat fluxes (LE, r(2) = 0.42, MEF = 0.14) and and net ecosystem CO2 exchange (NEE, r(2) = 0.38, MEF = 0.26). Seasonal variations in GPP, ER, NEE, and energy fluxes on monthly scales showed moderate to high r(2) values (0.57-0.86). For spatial across-site gradients of annual mean GPP, ER, NEE, and LE, r(2) values of 0.93, 0.89, 0.27, and 0.71 were achieved, respectively. Water table (WT) variation was not well predicted (r(2) <0.1), likely due to the uncertain water input to the peat from surrounding areas. However, the poor performance of WT simulation did not greatly affect predictions of ER and NEE. We found a significant relationship between optimized V-cmax and latitude (temperature), which better reflects the spatial gradients of annual NEE than using an average V-cmax value.Peer reviewe
Non-microbial methane formation in oxic soils
Methane plays an important role as a radiatively and chemically active gas in our atmosphere. Until recently, sources of atmospheric methane in the biosphere have been attributed to strictly anaerobic microbial processes during degradation of organic matter. However, a large fraction of methane produced in the anoxic soil layers does not reach the atmosphere due to methanotrophic consumption in the overlaying oxic soil. Although methane fluxes from aerobic soils have been observed, an alternative source other than methanogenesis has not been identified thus far. <br></br> Here we provide evidence for non-microbial methane formation in soils under oxic conditions. We found that soils release methane upon heating and other environmental factors like ultraviolet irradiation, and drying-rewetting cycles. We suggest that chemical formation of methane during degradation of soil organic matter may represent the missing soil source that is needed to fully understand the methane cycle in aerobic soils. Although the emission fluxes are relatively low when compared to those from wetlands, they may be important in warm and wet regions subjected to ultraviolet radiation. We suggest that this methane source is highly sensitive to global change
Recommended from our members
ORCHIDEE-PEAT (revision 4596), a model for northern peatland CO2, water, and energy fluxes on daily to annual scales
Peatlands store substantial amounts of carbon and are vulnerable to climate change. We present a modified version of the Organising Carbon and Hydrology In Dynamic Ecosystems (ORCHIDEE) land surface model for simulating the hydrology, surface energy, and CO2 fluxes of peatlands on daily to annual timescales. The model includes a separate soil tile in each 0.5° grid cell, defined from a global peatland map and identified with peat-specific soil hydraulic properties. Runoff from non-peat vegetation within a grid cell containing a fraction of peat is routed to this peat soil tile, which maintains shallow water tables. The water table position separates oxic from anoxic decomposition. The model was evaluated against eddy-covariance (EC) observations from 30 northern peatland sites, with the maximum rate of carboxylation (Vcmax) being optimized at each site. Regarding short-term day-to-day variations, the model performance was good for gross primary production (GPP) (r2 Combining double low line 0.76; Nash-Sutcliffe modeling efficiency, MEF Combining double low line 0.76) and ecosystem respiration (ER, r2 Combining double low line 0.78, MEF Combining double low line 0.75), with lesser accuracy for latent heat fluxes (LE, r2 Combining double low line 0.42, MEF Combining double low line 0.14) and and net ecosystem CO2 exchange (NEE, r2 Combining double low line 0.38, MEF Combining double low line 0.26). Seasonal variations in GPP, ER, NEE, and energy fluxes on monthly scales showed moderate to high r2 values (0.57-0.86). For spatial across-site gradients of annual mean GPP, ER, NEE, and LE, r2 values of 0.93, 0.89, 0.27, and 0.71 were achieved, respectively. Water table (WT) variation was not well predicted (r2<0.1), likely due to the uncertain water input to the peat from surrounding areas. However, the poor performance of WT simulation did not greatly affect predictions of ER and NEE. We found a significant relationship between optimized Vcmax and latitude (temperature), which better reflects the spatial gradients of annual NEE than using an average Vcmax value
Spatio-temporal variability and controls on methane and nitrous oxide in the Guadalquivir Estuary, Southwestern Europe
Estuaries are significant methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) emitters, although dynamics of both greenhouse gases in these ecosystems are regulated by complex processes. In this work, we aimed at characterizing the spatio-temporal distribution of CH4 and N2O in the Guadalquivir river estuary (SW Spain), the southernmost European estuary. During eight sampling cruises conducted between 2016 and 2017, surface water CH4 and N2O concentrations were measured along the salinity gradient of the estuary by using static-head space equilibration gas chromatography. The CH4 and N2O saturation ranges over the estuarine transect were 520â30,800% (average 2285%) and 40â390% (average 183%), respectively and airâwater fluxes ranged from 13 to 1000 ”mol mââ2 dayââ1(average 66.2 ”mol mââ2 dayââ1) for CH4 and from ââ7 to 35 ”mol mââ2 dayââ1 (average 8.5 ”mol mââ2 dayââ1) for N2O. A slight increase in the emissions was detected upstream and no seasonal trends were observed. Mixing between freshwater and oceanic waters influenced biogeochemistry of estuarine waters, affecting CH4 and N2O fluxes. In order to identify potential sources of CH4 and N2O, biogeochemical parameters involved in the formation pathways of both gases, such as salinity, dissolved oxygen, nutrients and organic matter were analyzed. Results suggested that sulfate inhibition and microbial oxidation played a relevant role in dissolved CH4 accumulation in the water column whereas associations found between N2O, nitrate and oxygen indicated that nitrification was a major source of this gas. Therefore, the influence of the tidal-fluvial interaction on ecosystem metabolism regulates trace gas dynamics in the Guadalquivir estuary.This research was funded by the project 1539/2015 from the Spanish Ministry for Agriculture, Food and Environment.Peer reviewe